Vertebral Bodies or Discs: Which Contributes More to Human-like Lumbar Lordosis?

Ella Been PhD, Alon Barash MSc, Assaf Marom BSc, Patricia A. Kramer PhD
Basic Research
Volume 468, Issue 7 / July , 2009

Abstract on SpringerLink | Full article HTML | Full article PDF

Download Citation

Abstract

Background

The attainment of upright posture, with its requisite lumbar lordosis, was a major turning point in human evolution. Nonhuman primates have small lordosis angles, whereas the human spine exhibits distinct lumbar lordosis (30°–80°). We assume the lumbar spine of the pronograde ancestors of modern humans was like those of extant nonhuman primates, but which spinal components changed in the transition from small lordosis angles to large ones is not fully understood.

Questions/Purposes

We wished to determine the relative contribution of vertebral bodies and intervertebral discs to lordosis angles in extant primates and humans.

Methods

We measured the lordosis, intervertebral disc, and vertebral body angles of 100 modern humans (orthograde primates) and 56 macaques (pronograde primates) on lateral radiographs of the lumbar spine (humans–standing, macaques–side-lying).

Results

The humans exhibited larger lordosis angles (51°) and vertebral body wedging (5°) than did the macaques (15° and −25°, respectively). The differences in wedging of the intervertebral discs, however, were much less pronounced (46° versus 40°).

Conclusions

These observations suggest the transition from pronograde to orthograde posture (ie, the lordosis angle) resulted mainly from an increase in vertebral body wedging and only in small part from the increase in wedging of the intervertebral discs.

Go to Issue Contents