| Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research |
| © The Association of Bone and Joint Surgeons 2008 |
| 10.1007/s11999-008-0261-0 |
Nicola Maffulli1
, Umile Giuseppe Longo2, Francesco Franceschi2, Carla Rabitti3 and Vincenzo Denaro2
| (2) | Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Campus Biomedico University, Rome, Italy |
| (3) | Department of Surgical Pathology, Campus Biomedico University, Rome, Italy |
![]() |
Nicola Maffulli Email: n.maffulli@keele.ac.uk |
Received: 5 November 2007 Accepted: 3 April 2008 Published online: 25 April 2008
Painful tendon disorders are a major problem in competitive and recreational sports [10, 13, 14, 18]. Over the last decade, several studies have provided the opportunity to develop novel therapeutic strategies [4–9, 17, 19, 23, 26]. While many of the epidemiological and imaging difficulties have been addressed [2, 11], relatively few studies have tried to quantify the histopathological findings of tendinopathy [18, 20, 21], and the histopathological changes are currently described in a subjective or at best semiquantitative fashion [1, 12, 20, 25, 27]. This may result in uncertainty about the histopathological findings of tendinopathy, and has produced a lack of diagnostic uniformity among surgical pathologists. Ideally, the pathological diagnoses in different studies should follow an accepted classification scheme, thus allowing data comparison and combination.
We are aware of two scoring systems that can be used for classification of the histopathological findings of tendinopathy: the Movin score [27] and its validated modifications [17, 20, 25] and the Bonar score [3].
We asked whether these two scores of abnormal tendon tissue were comparable. We also described the appearances of control and abnormal tendon.
In a prospective multicenter study we obtained 98 tendon samples to evaluate the two available scoring systems that quantify the changes associated with the process of tendinopathy. Eighty-eight of the 98 samples were ruptured supraspinatus tendons obtained from patients (49 men, 39 women; mean age, 58.2 years) who had sustained a rotator cuff tear and underwent arthroscopic repair of the lesion at our center between January 2004 and September 2006. The remaining 10 samples were nonruptured rotator cuff tendons from deceased patients. The tendon samples used in the present study have already been described in previous publications from our group [17, 18]. All procedures described in this study were approved by our respective Ethics Committees. All patients or their relatives gave written informed consent for participation in the study.
For the patients with tendon rupture, nonoperative treatment (including nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs, physiotherapy and rest) failed in all patients, and they continued to experience unacceptable pain and weakness in the affected shoulder. None of the patients had received injections of corticosteroids and none had undergone prior surgery on the affected shoulder. All patients fulfilled the following criteria: (1) positive cuff signs on preoperative examination; (2) no episodes of shoulder instability; (3) no radiographic sign of fracture of the glenoid or the tuberosities; (4) MRI evidence of cuff tear; (5) rotator cuff tear of one or more tendons at arthroscopic examination; and (6) no lesion of the glenoid labrum or of the capsule at arthroscopic examination. At arthroscopy, a piece of supraspinatus tendon that was not directly involved in the tear (about 4 mm × 4 mm in size) was harvested en bloc within the arthroscopically intact middle portion of the tendon between the lateral edge of the tendon tear and the muscle-tendon junction.
For the 10 nonruptured rotator cuff tendons from deceased patients, the right and left supraspinatus tendons were obtained from each of five male patients who died of cardiovascular events (mean age, 69.6 years). The tendons were harvested in the post-mortem room under sterile conditions. The rotator cuff tendon was freed from surrounding tissue, and as much muscle and fat as possible were removed. According to the patients’ relatives and from consultation of the hospital notes, no patient had sustained an acute or overuse injury to the rotator cuff tendon, and no patient had taken corticosteroids during the past 5 years.
All the tendon samples were placed in 20 mL of sterile 10% formalin in a universal container for transportation to the pathology department. Once fixed with buffered 10% formalin, the pieces were dehydrated, embedded in paraffin, and cut in 4 μm sections. Finally, five sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin and the other five sections with Alcian blue (pH 2.5) methods for the detection of the areas rich in glycosaminoglycan (GAG), and examined under white light microscopy and under polarized light microscopy.
For each tendon and each staining technique, three slides were randomly selected and two authors (UGL and LR) examined each using a light microscope. We used a computer generated random-numbers table to allocate slides. The identification number on each slide was covered with a removable sticker, and each slide was numbered using randomly generated numbers. The area of each specimen showing the most advanced pathologic changes was selected, and the worst possible results for each slide were used in this study. The slides were interpreted using the semiquantitative grading scale of Movin [20, 25, 27] and the Bonar score [3], which assess various aspects of tendon tissue. The whole slide was assessed for areas of increased cellularity.
The variables included in the Movin scale are (1) fiber structure; (2) fiber arrangement; (3) rounding of the nuclei; (4) regional variations in cellularity; (5) increased vascularity; (6) decreased collagen stainability; (7) hyalinization; and (8) GAG content. Each variable is scored between 0 and 3, with 0 being normal, 1 slightly abnormal, 2 abnormal, and 3 markedly abnormal. The hematoxylin and eosin stained slides were used to assess the first seven variables and the Alcian blue stained slides were used to assess GAG content. The total semiquantitative histologic score for a given slide could vary between 0 (normal tendon) and 24 (the most severe abnormality detectable).
|
Variables |
Grade 0 |
Grade 1 |
Grade 2 |
Grade 3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Tenocytes |
Inconspicuous elongated spindle shaped nuclei with no obvious cytoplasm at light microscopy |
Increased roundness: nucleus becomes more ovoid to round in shape without conspicuous cytoplasm |
Increased roundness and size: the nucleus is round, slightly enlarged and a small amount of cytoplasm is visible |
Nucleus is round, large with abundant cytoplasm and lacuna formation (chondroid change) |
|
Ground substance |
No stainable ground substance |
Stainable mucin between fibers but bundles still discrete |
Stainable mucin between fibers with loss of clear demarcation of bundles |
Abundant mucin throughout with inconspicuous collagen staining |
|
Collagen |
Collagen arranged in tightly cohesive well-demarcated bundles with a smooth dense bright homogeneous polarization pattern with normal crimping |
Diminished fiber polarization: separation of individual fibers with maintenance of demarcated bundles |
Bundle changes: separation of fibers with loss of demarcation of bundles giving rise to expansion of the tissue overall and clear loss of normal polarization pattern |
Marked separation of fibers with complete loss of architecture |
|
Vascularity |
Inconspicuous blood vessels coursing between bundles |
Occasional cluster of capillaries, less than one per 10 high-power fields |
1–2 clusters of capillaries per 10 high power fields |
Greater than two clusters per 10 high-power fields |
We used the chi square test was used to ascertain the association between the types of tendon (control or ruptured) and the histologic score. The Mann-Whitney U-test was used to determine whether the sum-score difference between the two tendon groups was noteworthy. We used an intraclass correlation coefficient to evaluate the correlation between Movin score and Bonar score (p < 0.05).
The intraclass correlation between the Movin and Bonar scores was 0.921 (p < 0.0001) (confidence interval 95%, 0.790–0.963).
|
Total tendon pathologic score |
Control tendons |
Ruptured tendons |
|---|---|---|
|
Mean |
3.9 |
17 |
|
Median |
3 |
18 |
|
SD |
2.42 |
1.88 |
|
Range |
1–7 |
11–23 |
|
Variable |
Control tendons (N = 10) |
Ruptured tendons (N = 88 ) |
||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
|
|
Fiber structure |
6 |
3 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
8 |
32 |
48 |
|
Fiber arrangement |
6 |
2 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
11 |
31 |
46 |
|
Rounding of the nuclei |
5 |
4 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
36 |
51 |
|
Regional variations in cellularity |
6 |
2 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
35 |
53 |
|
Increased vascularity |
6 |
3 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
35 |
53 |
|
Decreased collagen stainability |
7 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
13 |
24 |
51 |
|
Hyalinization |
6 |
3 |
1 |
0 |
54 |
20 |
10 |
4 |
|
GAG |
8 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
10 |
16 |
34 |
28 |
|
Total tendon pathologic score |
Control tendons |
Ruptured tendons |
|---|---|---|
|
Mean |
1.9 |
9.53 |
|
Median |
2 |
10 |
|
SD |
1.29 |
1.55 |
|
Range |
0–4 |
6–12 |
|
Variable |
Control tendons (N = 10) |
Ruptured tendons (N = 88 ) |
||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
|
|
Tenocytes |
5 |
4 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
36 |
51 |
|
Ground substance |
8 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
10 |
16 |
34 |
28 |
|
Collagen |
6 |
2 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
38 |
45 |
|
Vascularity |
6 |
3 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
35 |
53 |
Two scoring systems can be used for classification of the histopathological findings of tendinopathy: the Movin score [27] and its validated modifications [17, 20, 25] and the Bonar score [3].
We wished to ascertain whether these two scores of abnormal tendon tissue were comparable. In our hands, Movin and Bonar scores assess the same characteristics of tendon pathology.
The assessment system used was semiquantitative. We are conscious of the limitations of this assessment system, as we categorize in four classes (from 0, normal, to 3, markedly abnormal) a qualitative evaluation of several aspects of the histopathological appearance of the tendon section examined. It is likely the fully automated image analysis systems used in other fields of musculoskeletal medicine will be used in this field as well, and thus allow a more objective quantification of the abnormal appearance of tendinopathic tendons. Both the Movin [27] and Bonar scores [3] are based on semiquantitative criteria to assess the changes associated with the process of tendinopathy on a four-point scale ranging from 0 to 3. A formal assessment of their validity and reliability has not yet been performed. In this study, both scores were used simultaneously, and then compared in a large group of patients with rotator cuff tears and in controls. However, we recognize convergent validity (i.e., comparing two scales that have not been validated against some independent gold standard) does not constitute complete validation.
The fact that there are two semiquantitative scores to choose from when trying to quantify the degree of tendinopathy could engender confusion in researchers. Also, the two scales were originally developed for the Achilles tendon (Movin) [27] and the patellar tendon (Bonar) [3]. We have subsequently used the Movin scale for the patellar tendon [25], and to assess the degree of tendinopathy in the rotator cuff [17], and the long head of the biceps tendon [16].
We have demonstrated the Bonar semiquantitative scale [3] can be used in the upper limb as well, and the scale is simple and reproducible. Also, the two scales have a high correlation and essentially assess the same characteristics and variables of tendon pathology. A minor difference between these two scoring systems is the grading and definition of hyalinization. Hyalinization is assigned as Grade 0 to 3 in the Movin system, and it is not present in the Bonar score. The Movin scoring system [27] defines the grading of hyalinization as normal 0, slightly abnormal 1, abnormal 2, and markedly abnormal 3. In the present investigation, only a few specimens showed any evidence of hyalinization. In our previous use of Movin’s scale in tendinopathy of the lower limb [20, 22, 25], we came to realize that hyalinization is seldom present, and it is a poorly reproducible histopathological criterion in tendinopathic samples. For this reason, we proposed to remove this criterion from the assessment scale.
In both the Bonar [3] and Movin scales [27], special staining (GAG) is also used. We acknowledge it is important to assess the stainability of ground substance but, for practical purposes, this staining technique is costly, time consuming and does not seem to convey any further information on tendon histopathology than those reached from standard hematoxylin and eosin staining. Modified Movin score does not include an extra portion regarding ground substance. We recommend using it rather than the Movin score or the Bonar score.
Obviously, the fact that more advanced histochemical and immunohistochemical techniques and electron microscopy—to detect, for example, extra lipids, calcium deposits, collagen denaturation, pathologic tenocyte metabolism, collagen types, and foreign materials—were not used may have resulted in an underestimation of tendon abnormalities in the control group. However, our aim was to perform an easily reproducible study. Hematoxylin and eosin staining is widely available, is cost-effective, and requires little technical ability. Also, most pathologists are familiar with hematoxylin and eosin staining, and are used to interpreting a variety of specimens stained in this fashion.
Specific patterns in tendon abnormalities are difficult to distinguish even for well-trained pathologists with a special interest in this field [15]. We propose a simple and reproducible semiquantitative scale employing a commonly used staining technique that is easily accessible to the orthopaedic and pathology community at large.
We are aware of the fact that we could count the number of the cells but, again, we preferred to perform an easily reproducible study. In line with previous studies in the Achilles [20, 22, 27], patellar [25], and supraspinatus tendon [17] performed by our group and others using the semiquantitative scale employed in the present study, the evaluation of the number of cells is performed in a semiquantitative, not quantitative, fashion. We agree it is possible to actually count the number of cells per each microscopic field [30], but this would have changed the criteria used in calculating the pathological score.
Because several centers are undertaking studies on tendinopathy [24, 28, 29], the individual studies are unlikely to be large enough to result in adequate power for reliable evaluation. Therefore, combining the data from those studies with a similar study design will be essential. Consistent high-quality histologic data are thus critical for the success of the studies.