Cementless fixation, with or without screw augmentation, has evolved during the past few decades as the preferred method for acetabular reconstruction [20]. Favorable early and midterm results of press-fit cementless acetabular component designs have been reported. Latimer and Lachiewicz [24] reported no revision or loosening at 7 years in a series of 136 cups inserted with screws, whereas an overall survivorship rate of 97.7% was reported by Böhm and Bösche [5] at 11 years. Both groups of investigators used the Harris-Galante I implant. Using four different cup designs in 152 patients, Lewallen and Cabanela reported one revision for aseptic loosening and no evidence of osteolysis at a 5-year minimum followup [25]. In a more recent study, Udomkiat et al. reported 99.1% survivorship at 12 years for hemispheric cups implanted without screws [35].

Osteolysis resulting from polyethylene wear has been recognized as a major limitation in long-term survival of modular cementless cups. A deficient locking mechanism and micromotion of the liner in conjunction with screw holes allow backside debris to gain access to the bone-implant interface and accelerate periprosthetic osteolysis and loosening [6, 11, 12, 19, 23]. Younger age and initial diagnosis of osteonecrosis are known to adversely influence the long-term outcome of THA [2, 3, 10, 27, 33].

Initial stability is also fundamental for survivorship of cementless cups. Press-fit techniques provide optimal conditions for bone ingrowth and fixation. Pore size, bone-implant apposition, and material properties all influence bone ingrowth and long-term stability [4, 15].

Improvement on all aspects of acetabular design, including wear-resistant bearing surfaces and innovative approaches to bone ingrowth, theoretically will improve outcomes. One such approach is the monoblock trabecular metal cup made of a novel porous material to enhance ingrowth and eliminate backside wear. Some reports of the TMT cup in primary THA documented no revisions resulting from aseptic loosening or progressive radiolucencies at the interface [16, 22, 26, 29], but the long-term behavior of this cup is unknown. The incidence of gaps in the bone-implant interface is relatively high with this design [16, 22, 26, 34], but it appears they do not influence long-term stability [16, 26]. The use of this elliptic cup designed for rim fit is also of some concern in dysplastic hips with an irregular and shallow acetabulum.

Our primary question was to whether there would be a high survivorship of the TMT cup. Secondarily, we asked whether survivorship of the cup depended on the primary diagnosis and the patient’s age; finally we investigated the fate of the gaps and cysts detected on postoperative radiographs.

All patients had a TMT acetabular component with peripheral screw holes (Trabecular Metal™ Technology; Zimmer, Warsaw, IN) through a posterior approach. The TMT cup is elliptic with high surface roughness designed for an interference fit at the periphery of the prepared acetabular cavity. The cup is one piece with the polyethylene liner compression-molded into the porous tantalum to eliminate backside wear. The shell diameter is approximately 2 mm greater at the periphery of the cup than at the dome. Reaming is performed up to the size of the polar diameter of the cup, which is the actual size of the dome. This allows excellent line-to-line coaptation of the dome while press-fit is achieved by the 2-mm greater size of the cup periphery at a range of 20° from the cup equator. All cups were implanted with the press-fit technique. In 27 hips, screws were used to augment initial stability. Polyethylene liners with 10° elevated posterior rims were used in all cases. The outer diameter of the cup ranged from 42 to 60 mm. Femoral heads with a diameter of 22 mm were implanted in 23 hips and 28 mm in the remaining 217. Ninety-two heads were made of cobalt-chromium alloy, whereas the remaining 148 heads were made of alumina ceramic. Cobalt-chromium heads were used for 22-mm heads and when a skirted head was chosen.

A cementless hydroxyapatite-coated femoral stem (Proxilock; Implex, Allendale, NJ) was used in the majority of the patients (214 hips) and a cemented stem (F-115; Implex) was used in 20 hips as a result of poor bone quality or as a result of malformation of the proximal femur in patients with DDH. A cementless distal locking stem (Conelock; Implex) was used in six hips of patients with DDH.

All patients received low-molecular-weight heparin 12 hours postoperatively and for 6 weeks thereafter. One preoperative and three postoperative doses of a second-generation cephalosporin were given for prophylaxis in the majority of these patients.

Patients were evaluated at 6 weeks; 1, 2, 3, and 5 years postoperatively; and yearly thereafter. Clinical assessment was performed by the senior author (KNM) using the Harris hip score [17] at each followup. Patient-reported outcome using the Oxford hip score questionnaire also was obtained from all patients at the last followup. The Oxford questionnaire consists of 12 questions specifically designed to obtain patient-reported outcome score from patients who underwent THA [8].

Standard radiographs included an anteroposterior (AP) view of the pelvis and AP and lateral views of the proximal part of the femur. Two examiners, the senior author (KNM) and a fellowship-trained surgeon (SV) not involved in surgery or patient care, examined the radiographs independently. In two cases in which there was disagreement, a consensus was reached between the examiners. The 6-week postoperative radiograph served as the baseline for identifying polar gaps or cysts, subsequent subsidence, interfacial radiolucencies, osteolysis, and component loosening. Regions in which the surface of the acetabular component was not in contact with bone on the immediate postoperative radiographs were classified as gaps to distinguish them from radiolucent lines that might appear on subsequent radiographs in areas in which no gaps had existed initially or in which gaps had disappeared [33]. Osteoarthritic cysts in the subchondral bone were recorded and progressively evaluated. Periacetabular osteolytic lesions were assessed according to the zones described by DeLee and Charnley [9]. Migration of the cup was assessed using the criteria described by Nunn et al. [30]. We considered cups well fixed if they had no radiolucent lines or migration observed on the radiographs at last followup. Cups with a circumferential radiolucent line of 1 mm or less in width and without migration were considered to have a stable fibrous union. Cups with progressive radiolucent lines and those exhibiting migration were considered loose.

We analyzed any association of diagnosis with reoperation rate using one-way analysis of variance; pairwise comparisons were performed using post hoc t tests with Bonferroni correction to compare the incidence of polar gaps, the size of the cups used, and the mean age at implantation between the three major diagnoses. The level of significance was 5%. We used the Kaplan-Meier method to generate survivorship curves, with 95% confidence intervals, with reoperation as the end point. Curves were generated for the total cohort and for each major diagnosis.

The TMT acetabular component incorporates three distinctive innovative characteristics: it is elliptic; it is fitted with a monoblock, nonmodular, compression-molded polyethylene liner; and its metal shell is made of a porous tantalum material that resembles cancellous bone. Because this implant was introduced to our institution soon after it was released for clinical use, this study represents the comprehensive results of its earliest use and longest followup available on implant survivorship and the behavior of gaps and cysts detected on the immediate postoperative radiographs. Furthermore, this is the first report regarding the use of the TMT cup in younger patients and patients undergoing THA because of DDH or ON.

There are several limitations of this study design. We had no control group and the followup was relatively short. Clinical and radiographic outcomes of cementless THA are well documented [1, 5, 35, 36]. As mentioned previously, this study presents the comprehensive results of one of the earliest clinical applications of the TMT cup. A second limitation is that the hips were evaluated radiographically with plain radiographs. Radiographs typically underestimate the true incidence of osteolysis. We chose to include gaps larger than 2 mm to minimize marginal methodologic errors. We believe interpretation of serial radiographs independently from two experienced surgeons reduced this risk. To minimize the possible bias, one of the examiners, a fellowship-trained hip surgeon (VS), not involved in surgery or patient care, evaluated the radiographs independently. No considerable differences were observed between the examiners.

Only three reoperations occurred relatively early and the minimum followup of this cohort is 3 years; therefore, survivorship analysis is indicative only and for the same reasons sample power analysis would not be reliable. Kaplan-Meier curves were generated and included in this report despite these limitations. The cost of the implant is considerably higher than conventional designs and questions have been raised concerning the cost-effectiveness of this implant for use in primary cases. Because there are no data on long-term survivorship of this implant and its performance in comparison with contemporary designs, it is not possible to estimate its cost-effectiveness in association with complication rate, revision incidence and complexity, and total hospital and social costs.

Porous-coated metal-backed cups have had revision rates ranging from 0% to approximately 8% after at least 5 years followup [1, 5, 35]. Most of these revisions are the result of failure of fixation secondary to osteolysis [32, 39]. We had no revisions resulting from loosening and we detected no progressive radiolucencies with the use of the TMT monoblock acetabular component. Our results are similar to the results reported by others [16, 22, 26, 29]. In a multicenter study [16], Gruen et al. reported radiographic results of 414 monoblock acetabular cups with followups ranging from 2 to 5 years. They reported no revisions for loosening and no progressive periacetabular radiolucencies. Macheras et al. [26] reported no revision and no progressive radiolucencies with the TMT cup in 86 primary THAs with an average followup of 7.2 years. Komarasamy et al. [22] and Mulier et al. [29] reported on the same implant at an average of 32 and 46 months followup, respectively. No revisions or radiolucencies and excellent clinical outcomes were reported in both studies. Mulier et al. reported there was cancellous bone densification in Zone I (79%) and Zone III (58%) in 24 hips that had complete radiographic evaluation. We observed similar densification in almost half of our patients (58%). By contrast, stress shielding and decreased bone density have been reported with the use porous-coated implants [37]. The clinical relevance of such a finding and whether it is attributable to the elasticity of the construct or the elliptic shape of the cup are unknown.

The average age of the patients at implantation was 56 years in these series and reflects the high percentage of patients treated for secondary OA either because of DDH or ON. Younger age increases the incidence of osteolysis and aseptic loosening in patients with OA [10, 28]. Although it is unclear whether it is attributable to bone quality, the underlining diagnosis, implants used, or the age of the patients with ON, results of THA in patients with ON are inferior when compared with results in the general population in some reports [2, 3, 31]. Other studies evaluating more contemporary implant designs have had results comparable with those of the general population [7, 14, 38]. Ours is the first report of patients with ON treated with TMT cups and results are comparable with the results of TMT cups in patients with OA and second-generation cementless cups [7, 14, 38].

Despite the fact the shallow acetabulum and irregular rim could pose difficulties when implanting an elliptic rim fit component, we have used TMT cups in patients with DDH. The initial stability was judged as excellent intraoperatively and no difference was observed in this group with the remaining patients. Our results were comparable to those reported with porous-coated cups in patients with DDH [18, 21].

The prevalence of Zone II gaps is inherent to the peripheral press-fit technique monoblock construct and the high friction of trabecular metal. Gruen et al. [16] reported 84% of gaps were filled in their series. In the same report, a cohort of 83 patients was randomized to receive monoblock elliptic cups made either of tantalum or titanium. Filling in of gaps was less in the titanium group, whereas radiolucencies were more frequent in the same group. They attributed it to the monoblock construct, the elasticity, and the osteoconductivity of the trabecular metal. Macheras et al. [26] also reported a high incidence of polar gaps (25 of 82 cases). Using digital measurement analysis of the radiographs, they reported complete filling of all these gaps at 24 weeks. Komarasamy et al. [22] also reported a high incidence (22%) of polar gaps in their series. All gaps were filled at the last followup. In our series, only 30.3% of the gaps and 50% of OA cysts initially detected on plain radiographs were filled by the end of followup. However, there was no evidence of lysis or enlargement of the gaps or cysts. Until now, persistence of residual gaps did not adversely affect the fate of the component. Increased bone density and formation of augmented trabecular struts around the gaps have been observed in most of these patients (Figs. 3–5).

Implantation of a monoblock elliptic acetabular component might be demanding. Assessment of metal-to-bone contact is not possible because of the lack of screw holes on the dome and the presence of the liner. Indirect methods of assessment and a high incidence of dome gaps have been reported [34]. Lack of modularity does not allow use of offset liners when needed and there are concerns regarding potential revisions because the lack of modularity does not allow liner exchange alone. Although extensive wear of the polyethylene liner has not been reported nor did we observe any in our series, it is still of concern.

Our clinical and radiographic results, and the results of others [16, 22, 26, 29], show satisfactory performance of the monoblock trabecular cup at 5 years. However, longer followup is needed to draw safe conclusions.